Select for details and cases.
- Race and Color
- National Origin
- Sex, Sexuality and Pregnancy
- Religion and Religious Practices
- Race and Color (return to top)
- Prohibits discrimination because of racial origins in Africa,
Asia; protects Native Americans, Eskimos, Native Hawaiians
- Whites, Europeans and Caucasians protected against race discrimination
under same standards as minorities
- McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co., 427
U.S. 273, 96 S.Ct.2574, 49 L.Ed.2d 493 (1976)
- Preference for lighter skin is "color discrimination"
- Walker v. Secretary of Treasury of IRS, 713 F.Supp.
403 (N.D.Ga.1989)
- Cannot use race of spouse to discriminate
- Parr v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance, 792 F.2d
888 (11th Cir.1986)
- National Origin (return to top)
- Definition: country from which your forbearers came
- Prohibits discrimination against ethnic groups (Italians,
Latinos, Polish, etc.)
- Prohibits discrimination based on cultural differences (Armenians,
Gypsies, Cajuns, etc.)
- Requiring English basic skills not discriminatory
- Frontera v. Sindell, 522 F.2d 1215 (6th Cir.1975)
- Vasquez v. McAllen Bag & Supply Co., 660 F.2d 686
(5thCir.1981)
- Fragante v. City and County of Honolulu, 888 F.2d 591
(9th Cir.1989)
- Prohibits discrimination against accented English
- Berke v. Ohio Dept. of Public Welfare, 628 F.2d 980
(6th Cir.1980)
- Sex, Sexuality and Pregnancy (return to top)
- Sex defined as gender, not sexuality or sexual practices
- Not discrimination to prefer persons because of:
- Sexuality: DeSantis v. Pacific Telephone, 608 F.2d
327 (9th Cir.1979)
- Sexual attractiveness: Malarkey v. Texaco, 559 F.Supp.
117 D.C.N.Y.1982), aff'd, 704F.2d 674 (2d Cir.1983)
- Sexual activity or morality: Thomas v. Metro Flight,
814 F.2d 1506 (10th Cir.1987)
- Rule applied to one sex only is discrimination
- No children for female employees: Phillips v. Martin Marietta
, 400 U.S. 542, 91 S.Ct. 496, 27 L.Ed.2d. 613 (1971)
- No employment for married women: Sprogis v. UAL,444
F.2d 1194 (7th Cir. 1971)
- May not measure performance in terms of sex stereotypes: Price
Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1775, 104 L.Ed.2d
268 (1989)
- Sex includes pregnancy and related conditions
- Not discrimination to use sexual preference as condition
- DeSantis v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph
- Ulane v. Eastern Airlines, 742 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir.1984)
- States and municipalities may limit discrimination based on
sexual preference
- Homosexuality not a disability for ADA and
504
- Religion and Religious Practices (return to top)
- Prohibits unless religion is BFOQ
- Pime v. Loyola Univ. of Chicago, 803 F.2d 351 (7th
Cir.1986)
- Abrams v. Baylor College of Medicine, 805 F.2d 528
(5th Cir.1986)
- Religion defined as organized faith
- Atheists are protected: EEOC v. Townley Manufacturing,
859 F.2d 610 (9th Cir.1988)
- Discrimination based on religion of secular employer prohibited
- Little v. Wuerl, 929 F.2d 944 (3rd Cir.1991) (termination
after divorce)
- Membership in Klan not protected religious activity
- Bellamy v. Mason's Store, 368 F.Supp. 1025 (D.C.Va.1973),
aff'd, 508 F.2d 504 (4th Cir.1974)
- Duty to accommodate (Holy Days, teaching Bible study, attending
church conventions)
- Redmond v. GAF Corp, 574 F.2d 897 (7th Cir.1978)
- Grooming and clothing practices protected
- Bhatia v. Chevron USA, 1984-1985 O.S.H.D. (CCH) 26,93,
734 F.2d 1382 (9th Cir.1984)
- Exemption for religious organizations
- Exempt from religious discrimination
- Does not apply to secular organizations
(return to top)